But if this case deteriorates into litigation Armageddon, let this be a start to the design of the battlefield. Based on this enormous caveat, and in the context of a case in which no plan [of reorganization] has obtained even the mild approval of any relevant constituency, we now begin to explain why both motions for estimation protocols will be denied.
In re Dow Corning Corp.
211 B.R. 545
My respect for this court as an institution compels me to make one last point: I dissociate myself completely from the amateur biology lecture that the majority impose on us throughout their opinion.
Moore v. Regents of Univ. of California
51 Cal. 3d 120
It seems that appellant consumed one plug of his purchase, which measured up to representations, that it was tobacco unmixed with human flesh, but when appellant tackled the second plug it made him sick, but, not suspecting the tobacco, he tried another chew, and still another, until he bit into some foreign substance, which crumbled like dry bread, and caused him to foam at the mouth, while he was getting “sicker and sicker.” Finally, his teeth struck something hard; he could not bite through it. After an examination he discovered a human toe, with flesh and nail intact. We refrain from detailing the further harrowing and nauseating details.
Pillars v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
117 Miss. 490
[L]anguage addressed to a pregnant or sick woman may be actionable where the same words would not be if they were addressed to a United States Marine.
comment c to section 48 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965)