lemon lines



Untitled






FollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowed

Above the Law
Adrianna
Andrew Durham
Antoine Doyen
Dr. Bacevich
Benen
Bill Pierce
Cassel
C.V.
Denk
Evan
Feminist Law Professors
Granta
Hadley
Hidden LA
Immigration
In These Times
IntLawGrrls
Ira
Joe
Jonah
Jonathan
Killian
Lawrence Hurley
LGBT law
Lukács
Mal
The Millions
Moran
PRI
Sarvas
SCOTUS blog
Sophia
SweetHotJustice
TNR
The Two-Way
WSJ Law Blog

klammer
Tagged
law


Wednesday, May 30th, 2012
The difficulty is, however, that even while acknowledging the sympathy that all must feel for people afflicted with painful, debilitating physical ailments that cannot be remedied, the court cannot take the place of Congress.

Kuromiya v. United States

37 F. Supp. 2d 717


∞10:25 am, by lemonlines Comments
[constitutional law] [medical marijuana] [Commerce Clause] [law]

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2012
It may be that it is the obnoxious thing in its mildest and least repulsive form; but illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way, namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure.

Boyd v. United States

116 U.S. 616 (1886)


∞08:17 am, by lemonlines1 note Comments
[criminal law] [self-incrimination] [search and seizure] [Bradley] [law]

Tuesday, May 22nd, 2012
This Court ordinarily is not so eager to abandon its precedents. [… ] [T]he Court’s reasoning in reaching its result is transparently wrong.

R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, Minn.

505 U.S. 377 (1992)


∞12:30 am, by lemonlines Comments
[White] [hate speech] [content-based regulation] [symbol] [object] [arouses anger alarm or resentment in others on basis of race color creed religion or gender] [law]

Saturday, May 12th, 2012
Does a hospital treating a patient in constructive police custody who dies at the hospital from gunshot wounds inflicted by police owe a duty to the decedent’s relatives to locate and notify them? We conclude that the hospital does not owe such a duty.

Aguirre-Alvarez v. Regents of Univ. of California

67 Cal. App. 4th 1058, 1060, 79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 580, 581 (1998)


∞01:49 am, by lemonlines Comments
[death] [notification] [hospital] [law]

Friday, Apr 27th, 2012
JUSTICE BREYER: Can I make that statement in an opinion, and you’ll say, that’s right?
MR. CLEMENT: I think what you could say —
JUSTICE BREYER: Can I say that?
MR. CLEMENT: I don’t think you can say just that.
Justice Breyer, Arizona v. U.S. oral arguments

∞12:17 pm, by lemonlines Comments
[Breyer] [sb 1070] [arizona] [immigration] [law] [SCOTUS] [oral argument]

  |   Next Page
Likes