[I]t is not only rational but also realistic and efficient for USCIS to rely on the records of the Immigration Court when calculating how many days have run on an applicant’s asylum clock… . This system is efficient; it prevents the duplication of work; and it decreases the risk of inconsistent calculations.
Gjondrekaj v. Napolitano
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90233 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2011)
Respondents also argue that the statute is ambiguous because it is plausible that the word “when” means “after,” and, in that case, the statute commands that the government “shall take the alien into custody after the alien is released.” This Court rejects the argument that “when” means “after.
Sylvain v. Holder
CIV. 11-3006 JAP, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69591, 2011 WL 2580506 (D.N.J. June 28, 2011)
The credibility of the applicant is of extreme importance in assessing the alien’s claim. I have taken into account the lack of rationality, the lack of internal consistency and the lack of inherent persuasiveness in her testimony, and have determined that this alien is not credible.
Eleven years after his decision—after making #19 on the list for asylum application denials—Judge Ferlise was removed from the Philadelphia-area Immigration Court calendar.
What makes this inquest significant is that these prisoners represent sinister influences that will lurk in the world long after their bodies have returned to dust. They are living symbols of racial hatreds, of terrorism and violence, and of the arrogance and cruelty of power.
United States Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson
Opening Address to the Int’l Military Tribunal at the Nuremberg Trials (Nov. 10, 1945)
“Though no one would ever think of using the term honor violence (we reserve that descriptor for brown people who live somewhere else, motivated by religious...”