lemon lines



Untitled






FollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowedFollowed


klammer
Tagged
election law


Does a state have to repeal or invalidate its murder prohibition if the homicide rate declines? We think not.

W. Tradition P’ship, Inc. v. Attorney Gen. of State

2011 MT 328


10:46 am, by lemonlines17 notes Comments

Leveling the playing field” can sound like a good thing. But in a democracy, campaigning for office is not a game.

Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom PAC v. Bennett

No. 10–238.  Argued March 28, 2011—Decided June 27, 2011

Roberts for the majority


06:21 am, by lemonlines37 notes Comments

The officials made themselves party to means whereby the machinery with which they are entrusted does not discharge the functions for which it was designed.

Terry v. Adams

345 U.S. 461


12:23 am, by lemonlines12 notes Comments

Arizonans deserve better. Like citizens across this country, Arizonans deserve a government that represents and serves them all. And no less, Arizonans deserve the chance to reform their electoral system so as to attain that most American of goals.


Truly, democracy is not a game. I respectfully dissent.

Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom PAC v. Bennett

No. 10–238.  Argued March 28, 2011—Decided June 27, 2011

Kagan for the dissent.


01:22 am, by lemonlines20 notes Comments

I can understand why the majority does not place much emphasis on this point. Some members of the majority have ridiculed the practice of relying on subsequent statements by legislators to demonstrate an earlier Congress’s intent in enacting a statute. See, e.g., Sullivan v. Finkelstein, 496 U. S. 617, 631–632 (1990) (SCALIA, J., concurring in part); United States v. Hayes, 555 U. S. 415, 434–435 (2009) (ROBERTS, C. J., dissenting).

So the majority has no evidence—zero, none—that the objective of the [Arizona Citizens Clean Elections] Act is anything other than the interest that the State asserts, the Act proclaims, and the history of public financing supports: fighting corruption.

Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom PAC v. Bennett

No. 10–238.  Argued March 28, 2011—Decided June 27, 2011

Kagan for the dissent.


02:36 am, by lemonlines22 notes Comments