These conflicts belie the majority’s claim of doctrinal consistency and underscore the illusory nature of its so-called solution to the commercial speech quandary.
The level of discourse reaching a mailbox simply cannot be limited to that which would be suitable for a sandbox … regardless of the strength of the government’s interest [in protecting children].
“Though no one would ever think of using the term honor violence (we reserve that descriptor for brown people who live somewhere else, motivated by religious...”