Respondents also argue that the statute is ambiguous because it is plausible that the word “when” means “after,” and, in that case, the statute commands that the government “shall take the alien into custody after the alien is released.” This Court rejects the argument that “when” means “after.
Sylvain v. Holder
CIV. 11-3006 JAP, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69591, 2011 WL 2580506 (D.N.J. June 28, 2011)
“Though no one would ever think of using the term honor violence (we reserve that descriptor for brown people who live somewhere else, motivated by religious...”